Soft Comput 1–11Īmrieh EA, Hamtini T, Aljarah I (2016) Mining educational data to predict student’s academic performance using ensemble methods. Karthikeyan VG, Thangaraj P, Karthik S (2020) Towards developing hybrid educational data mining model (HEDM) for efficient and accurate student performance evaluation. Hussain M, Zhu W, Zhang W, Abidi SMR, Ali S (2019) Using machine learning to predict student difficulties from learning session data. Hamsa H, Indiradevi S, Kizhakkethottam JJ (2016) Student academic performance prediction model using decision tree and fuzzy genetic algorithm. Gray CC, Perkins D (2019) Utilizing early engagement and machine learning to predict student outcomes. Int J Electr Comput Eng (2088–8708):9īravo-Agapito J, Romero SJ, Pamplona S (2020) Early prediction of undergraduate student’s academic performance in completely online learning: a five-year study. Springer, ChamĮl Guabassi I, Bousalem Z, Al Achhab M, EL Mohajir BE (2019) Identifying learning style through eye tracking technology in adaptive learning systems. In: International conference on advanced intelligent systems for sustainable development, pp 787–799. Educ Inf Technol 1–17īousalem Z, El Guabassi I, Cherti I (2018, July) Toward adaptive and reusable learning content using XML dynamic labeling schemes and relational databases. Syed AM, Ahmad S, Alaraifi A, Rafi W (2020) Identification of operational risks impeding the implementation of eLearning in higher education system. Comput Hum Behav 104:106189Įl Guabassi I, Al Achhab M, Jellouli I, Mohajir BEE (2018) Personalized ubiquitous learning via an adaptive engine. Waheed H, Hassan SU, Aljohani NR, Hardman J, Alelyani S, Nawaz R (2020) Predicting academic performance of students from VLE big data using deep learning models. Huang AY, Lu OH, Huang JC, Yin CJ, Yang SJ (2020) Predicting students’ academic performance by using educational big data and learning analytics: evaluation of classification methods and learning logs. Qazdar A, Er-Raha B, Cherkaoui C, Mammass D (2019) A machine learning algorithm framework for predicting students performance: a case study of baccalaureate students in Morocco. Hew KF, Hu X, Qiao C, Tang Y (2020) What predicts student satisfaction with MOOCs: a gradient boosting trees supervised machine learning and sentiment analysis approach. In: 2016 4th IEEE international colloquium on information science and technology (CiSt), pp 535–540. Educ Inf Technol 1–16Įl Guabassi I, Al Achhab M, Jellouli I, El Mohajir BE (2016, October) Recommender system for ubiquitous learning based on decision tree. Am J Distance Educ 1–20Īlenezi HS, Faisal MH (2020) Utilizing crowdsourcing and machine learning in education: literature review. Moubayed A, Injadat M, Shami A, Lutfiyya H (2020) Student engagement level in e-learning environment: clustering using k-means.
Int J Innov Res Comput Sci Technol 5(1):194–197 wikipedia.Kalaivani S, Priyadharshini B, Nalini BS (2017) Analyzing student’s academic performance based on data mining approach. An event with m to n "odds against" would have probability n/(m + n), while an event with m to n "odds on" would have probability m/(m + n).A bookmaker may (for his own purposes) use 'odds' of 'one-sixth', the overwhelming everyday use by most people is odds of the form 6 to 1, 6 -1, or 6/1 (all read as 'six-to-one') where the first figure represents the number of ways of failing to achieve the outcome and the second figure is the number of ways of achieving a favorable outcome: thus these are "odds against".Generally, 'odds' are not quoted to the general public in this format because of the natural confusion with the chance of an event occurring being expressed fractionally as a probability.The odds against you choosing Sunday are 6/1 = 6, meaning that it's 6 times more likely that you don't choose Sunday.
If you chose a random day of the week (7 days), then the odds that you would choose a Sunday would be: – (1/7)/ = 1/6, but not 1/7.